Aglow Logo
Back to Homepage
Opinion

Personality rights in AI age

Aglow News
October 1, 2025
Personality rights in AI age

Personality rights in AI age

The personality rights of a person are embedded in the significance that an individual puts on his name, image and likeness. These rights are different from the intellectual creations of a person. Personality rights can be likened to human rights in the sense that every individual possesses the right to the protection of the usage of his name, image and likeness, but this is not inalienable as human rights.Personality rights can earn a great deal of money if properly commercialised.

In 2019, Nigerian musician Innocent Idibia, popularly known as 2face or 2baba, signed an endorsement deal with Oraimo as the face of the brand. Such endorsement explains the power of the value that an image possesses, which can be exploited for mutual economic benefits.In sports, the commercialisation of an athlete’s image can earn them more money than their actual wages. Athletes with their recognisable personal brand generally assign this right to an Image Rights Company.

Article image

The IRC then negotiates licences with people interested in utilising the brand of the athlete to generate revenue either from Merchandise sales, advertisements, or sponsorship deals.On the other hand, the use of Images of persons could be profited from without getting consent or permission from the person being infringed. This usage could lead to disrepute for the infringed party. In 2022, a Nigerian comedian, Chukwuemeka Ejekwu, known as Oga Sabinus, expressed his intention to sue UAC Foods for N100m for using a cartoon – split image of himself in a commercial advert for Gala sausage roll without his consent.

With the introduction of artificial intelligence into human lives, there is a greater possibility for the misuse of a person’s image. To Kill a Monkey, a Netflix series produced by Kemi Adetiba, subtly highlighted this development. AI can now be used to create deepfakes, cloned voices, and even AI-generated likenesses. This possibility highlights the need for laws that can protect an individual’s personality from misuse.Personality rights are not traditionally provided for in the Nigerian Copyright Act, but, in applying protection to personality rights, several laws can be applied. A trademark, for example, could be used to protect names.

A registered trademark gives an individual or a brand the exclusive rights to identify a product or service with that name and bars others from copying or using the same.The Cybercrimes (Prohibition and Prevention) Act also provides that an offence is committed where a person uses a name, trademark, or other word owned or in use by any individual or body corporate without authorisation in relation to online marketing and advertisement. However, the CCPA does not protect against the misuse of images and likenesses of a person. The Nigeria Data Protection Regulation provides for names and images in its definition of personal data, but it does not make mention of likeness, i.e. AI AI-generated likeness.

It allows for redress for individuals whose image or personal data has been fraudulently used for commercial gain and without consent.However, this is not enough; if we’re serious about protecting the rights of individuals in Nigeria, then the law has to evolve to reflect the reality of the new age. The European Union, for example, has introduced the Artificial Intelligence Act, and the state of Tennessee has also introduced the Estates and Likenesses Virtual Image and Simulation Act, thus recognising the advancement that AI brings into the growing society.

It is thus increasingly important that steps are taken by the Nigerian government to not just recognise personality rights but to create laws that can protect these rights, i.e., a Personality Rights Act that protects personal identifiers like name, image, likeness, voice, and even digital replicas, or an AI Act that regulates high-risk AI systems. Personality rights aren’t just about individuals but also their brands. Faces, names, voices, and stories are used every day to sell products, drive traffic, and build entire industries.

Tags

Opinion

Related Posts

Abia’s Q3 2025 Financial Report: Unanswered Questions, Conflicting Figures and Rising Transparency Concerns By Obinna Oriaku

Abia’s Q3 2025 Financial Report: Unanswered Questions, Conflicting Figures and Rising Transparency Concerns By Obinna Oriaku

The Abia Q3 2025 Financial Report has raised more questions than answers, exposing inconsistencies that deepen public mistrust in the state’s financial disclosures. Despite record-high FAAC disbursements nationwide and an increase in internally generated revenue, the state’s reported figures contradict earlier claims and fail to reflect development on the ground. Critical concerns include the exclusion of local government allocations from SEFTAS reports—funds controlled by the state but never publicly accounted for—alongside suspicious shifts in expenditure classifications. Previously controversial items such as the nearly ₦1 billion Security Vote and the ₦300 million Government House feeding bill have been obscured under vague headings like “Research and Development,” which has consumed over ₦34 billion since 2023 with no clear outcomes. Large sectoral allocations—including ₦14.4 billion for Land and Housing, ₦9.1 billion for Transport, and ₦13.2 billion for Education—remain unexplained, with no corresponding projects visible across the state. Meanwhile, Agriculture continues to receive negligible funding despite rising food inflation, and local government pension figures are being reported in ways that distort basic accounting principles. Taken together, these discrepancies paint a troubling picture of financial opacity. Abians are simply asking for transparency and honest accounting—nothing more. Until the government reconciles these conflicting figures and provides verifiable explanations, public confidence in its financial reporting will remain in serious doubt.

Read More →
Africa’s AI moment: From consumption to digital sovereignty

Africa’s AI moment: From consumption to digital sovereignty

Africa stands at a pivotal moment in the global artificial intelligence revolution — a moment that will determine whether the continent remains a consumer of technology or emerges as a producer and rule-maker in the digital age. At the International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance in Abuja, scholars from across the Global South warned that Africa risks repeating its historical role as a supplier of raw materials — this time in the form of data. Despite powering much of the world’s AI systems, the continent captures less than 2% of global AI investment. Through debates on data, economy, and politics, participants argued that digital sovereignty — control over data, infrastructure, and governance — is essential to breaking cycles of dependency. They called for strategic investment in digital infrastructure, skills, and policy, as well as equitable partnerships that promote technology transfer and local innovation. The emerging consensus was clear: AI is not merely a technical field but an arena of economic power and political agency. Africa must engage as an equal rule-maker, not a passive beneficiary. Like the Dangote refinery’s symbolism of industrial self-determination, building AI sovereignty will require vision, courage, and long-term investment. If pursued with intent, Africa can move from being the world’s digital quarry to a defining voice in shaping the global AI order.

Read More →
Otti’s Rhetoric vs. Reality — Preaching Democracy While Practicing Selection.

Otti’s Rhetoric vs. Reality — Preaching Democracy While Practicing Selection.

Governor Alex Otti’s recent warning against election rigging — “Write your will before you write election results” — has made waves across Abia State. Yet, for many, his fiery rhetoric rings hollow. While he champions democracy publicly, Otti’s administration has been accused of bypassing internal party processes and handpicking local government officials through a splinter party seen as his personal vehicle. Critics argue that this selective practice of “elections” undermines the very democratic principles he claims to defend. As tensions rise ahead of the 2027 governorship race, Abians are left wondering: can Otti’s call for electoral integrity be trusted when his own record suggests otherwise?

Read More →

Share this article