Back to Homepage
Opinion

When public intellectuals blur the line between grievance and crime

Aglow News
December 24, 2025
When public intellectuals blur the line between grievance and crime

When public intellectuals blur the line between grievance and crime

Demagoguery has become an all-too-familiar sport among segments of Nigeria’s elite, many of whom readily weaponise ethnicity and religion to advance narrow personal ambitions. Rather than offer thoughtful solutions, they trade in fear, grievance, and identity politics, mobilising followers while corroding reasoned debate and public trust in institutions. By reducing complex social and security challenges to crude us-versus-them narratives, these actors inflame ethnic, religious, and political tensions, normalise intolerance, and create fertile ground for violence—leaving the nation more divided and fragile in the process.

One of the most dangerous demagogues in recent years, whose public statements constitute a threat to national security, is none other than Prof. Usman Yusuf, who is gradually upstaging Sheikh Ahmad Abubakar Gumi as the foremost defender of Fulani bandits and criminal elements ravaging northern Nigeria and the middle belt and gradually threatening the peace of the southern part of the country.

Yusuf is mainly known for two broad areas of controversy. He was the executive secretary at the National Health Insurance Scheme, whose less-than-impressive tenure was characterised by allegations of administrative misconduct, procurement irregularities, and internal power struggles. He was suspended and reinstated more than once by different authorities, leading to a prolonged institutional crisis at the agency. The latest controversy surrounding the man stems less from his academic work and more from his tiresome defence of Fulani bandits and other violent criminal networks.

His emergence as a public commentator and social critic began in 2023, when the government of President Muhammadu Buhari came to an end, and Bola Tinubu assumed power. He never openly opposed any of the mistakes made by the Buhari administration in eight years. The emergence of a Southerner appears to irk him to no end, triggering bile and negativity against the man who succeeded his former principal and creating the impression of a man who has no patience for anyone else in the presidential seat whose origin is not Fulani. I may not belong to the same political party as Tinubu, but I do not think that he has performed worse than his predecessor in all ramifications. And that is not to praise the Tinubu administration to high heavens or to claim that mistakes have not been made.
Related News

Article image


Lookman stunner rescues Eagles in AFCON opener
Labour tasks states, LGAs on insecurity
Mikel backs Eagles to win AFCON

For a country threatened by insecurity, Yusuf’s comments echo a pattern that involves downplaying crimes linked to armed Fulani groups while emphasising grievances faced by Fulani communities. While addressing historical marginalisation or socioeconomic drivers of conflict is legitimate, such narratives, when not accompanied by firm condemnation of violence, risk blurring the moral and legal boundaries between peaceful pastoralist struggles and organised criminal terror. Complaint of marginalisation cannot justify killings of tens of thousands of people, continuous abduction of innocent people, and displacement of millions of Nigerians.

Yusuf’s outbursts reflect a growing frustration with elite commentary perceived as detached from the lived realities of victims. Communities ravaged by attacks, farmers displaced from ancestral lands, and families of abducted schoolchildren expect public intellectuals to speak with empathy, balance, and responsibility.

Nigeria’s ongoing security crisis demands moral clarity, sensitivity to victims, and an unequivocal rejection of banditry and terrorism, regardless of ethnic identity. Yusuf owes the public a clear clarification of his views and an unambiguous condemnation of all forms of violent criminality. In moments of national trauma, ambiguity, or rhetoric perceived as tribal, only deepens mistrust and complicates efforts to restore peace and security.

Prof. Abiodun Raufu, former Editor of Nigerian Tribune and ex-Managing Director and Editor-in-Chief of National Mirror Newspapers, is an associate professor of Criminal Justice at Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, the United States of America

Tags

Opinion

Related Posts

Opinion: THINGS REMEMBERED: Mud Houses: Once Admired For Durability In Northern Communities

Opinion: THINGS REMEMBERED: Mud Houses: Once Admired For Durability In Northern Communities

Before cement buildings became widespread, mud houses served as durable, affordable, and environmentally friendly shelters across Northern Nigeria. Admired for their ability to withstand harsh weather conditions and preserve cool indoor temperatures, the structures remain enduring symbols of Hausa architectural excellence, communal living, and cultural identity despite growing threats from urbanisation and modernisation.

Opinion: The Limit Of Political Ambition

Opinion: The Limit Of Political Ambition

“Ambition in itself is not wrong, but when it begins to undermine public confidence in democratic institutions, then it becomes necessary to draw the line. Indeed, there must be limits to political ambition for democracy to truly flourish.”

Abia’s Q3 2025 Financial Report: Unanswered Questions, Conflicting Figures and Rising Transparency Concerns By Obinna Oriaku

Abia’s Q3 2025 Financial Report: Unanswered Questions, Conflicting Figures and Rising Transparency Concerns By Obinna Oriaku

The Abia Q3 2025 Financial Report has raised more questions than answers, exposing inconsistencies that deepen public mistrust in the state’s financial disclosures. Despite record-high FAAC disbursements nationwide and an increase in internally generated revenue, the state’s reported figures contradict earlier claims and fail to reflect development on the ground. Critical concerns include the exclusion of local government allocations from SEFTAS reports—funds controlled by the state but never publicly accounted for—alongside suspicious shifts in expenditure classifications. Previously controversial items such as the nearly ₦1 billion Security Vote and the ₦300 million Government House feeding bill have been obscured under vague headings like “Research and Development,” which has consumed over ₦34 billion since 2023 with no clear outcomes. Large sectoral allocations—including ₦14.4 billion for Land and Housing, ₦9.1 billion for Transport, and ₦13.2 billion for Education—remain unexplained, with no corresponding projects visible across the state. Meanwhile, Agriculture continues to receive negligible funding despite rising food inflation, and local government pension figures are being reported in ways that distort basic accounting principles. Taken together, these discrepancies paint a troubling picture of financial opacity. Abians are simply asking for transparency and honest accounting—nothing more. Until the government reconciles these conflicting figures and provides verifiable explanations, public confidence in its financial reporting will remain in serious doubt.

Share this article