Back to Homepage
Opinion

Proof of ownership and factory-fitted glass permit renewals

Aglow News
September 3, 2025
Proof of ownership and factory-fitted glass permit renewals

Proof of ownership and factory-fitted glass permit renewals

Article image

Across Nigeria today, vehicle owners are faced with a puzzling and frustrating reality: every year, we are compelled to “renew” documents that should not logically require renewal.

Two glaring examples are the Proof of Ownership Certificate and the Factory-Fitted Glass Permit.Let us start with the Proof of Ownership. By definition, this document affirms that I am the legal owner of my vehicle. Ownership is not an annual event it is a continuous status until I decide to sell or transfer the ownership of the vehicle.

If I have not disposed of the car, why should I be compelled to renew this proof every twelve months? What exactly has changed? This raises the uncomfortable suspicion that such policies are less about regulation and more about generating revenue at the expense of citizens.The case of the Factory-Fitted Glass Permit is equally baffling.

This permit simply acknowledges that certain features of a vehicle such as air conditioners, radios, or security devices were installed by the manufacturer. These are permanent features unless the owner physically removes them. Why then should a vehicle owner be forced to pay annually for a feature that is part of the original design of the car?

It is like asking a homeowner to pay yearly for the “permit” to have a roof over their head.In other parts of the world, proof of ownership is established once, at the point of purchase or registration and remains valid until ownership changes hands. Factory-fitted features are documented once and do not require repetitive payments. The Nigerian model, therefore, stands out as both inconvenient and financially burdensome for citizens who are already grappling with rising costs of living, high fuel prices, and multiple taxes.

A government’s duty is to make life easier for its citizens, not to create artificial obstacles that drain their pockets. True reform would mean abolishing these unnecessary annual renewals and replacing them with a system that aligns with global best practices proof of ownership and factory-fitted permits should be one-off processes, updated only when changes occur.

Until then, many Nigerians will continue to view these policies as nothing more than state-backed extortion an unfair levy on people for simply owning what they have already paid for. I, therefore, urge the authority concerned to drop this idea completely and focus on the true dividends of democracy.

Tags

Opinion

Related Posts

Abia’s Q3 2025 Financial Report: Unanswered Questions, Conflicting Figures and Rising Transparency Concerns By Obinna Oriaku

Abia’s Q3 2025 Financial Report: Unanswered Questions, Conflicting Figures and Rising Transparency Concerns By Obinna Oriaku

The Abia Q3 2025 Financial Report has raised more questions than answers, exposing inconsistencies that deepen public mistrust in the state’s financial disclosures. Despite record-high FAAC disbursements nationwide and an increase in internally generated revenue, the state’s reported figures contradict earlier claims and fail to reflect development on the ground. Critical concerns include the exclusion of local government allocations from SEFTAS reports—funds controlled by the state but never publicly accounted for—alongside suspicious shifts in expenditure classifications. Previously controversial items such as the nearly ₦1 billion Security Vote and the ₦300 million Government House feeding bill have been obscured under vague headings like “Research and Development,” which has consumed over ₦34 billion since 2023 with no clear outcomes. Large sectoral allocations—including ₦14.4 billion for Land and Housing, ₦9.1 billion for Transport, and ₦13.2 billion for Education—remain unexplained, with no corresponding projects visible across the state. Meanwhile, Agriculture continues to receive negligible funding despite rising food inflation, and local government pension figures are being reported in ways that distort basic accounting principles. Taken together, these discrepancies paint a troubling picture of financial opacity. Abians are simply asking for transparency and honest accounting—nothing more. Until the government reconciles these conflicting figures and provides verifiable explanations, public confidence in its financial reporting will remain in serious doubt.

Africa’s AI moment: From consumption to digital sovereignty

Africa’s AI moment: From consumption to digital sovereignty

Africa stands at a pivotal moment in the global artificial intelligence revolution — a moment that will determine whether the continent remains a consumer of technology or emerges as a producer and rule-maker in the digital age. At the International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance in Abuja, scholars from across the Global South warned that Africa risks repeating its historical role as a supplier of raw materials — this time in the form of data. Despite powering much of the world’s AI systems, the continent captures less than 2% of global AI investment. Through debates on data, economy, and politics, participants argued that digital sovereignty — control over data, infrastructure, and governance — is essential to breaking cycles of dependency. They called for strategic investment in digital infrastructure, skills, and policy, as well as equitable partnerships that promote technology transfer and local innovation. The emerging consensus was clear: AI is not merely a technical field but an arena of economic power and political agency. Africa must engage as an equal rule-maker, not a passive beneficiary. Like the Dangote refinery’s symbolism of industrial self-determination, building AI sovereignty will require vision, courage, and long-term investment. If pursued with intent, Africa can move from being the world’s digital quarry to a defining voice in shaping the global AI order.

Otti’s Rhetoric vs. Reality — Preaching Democracy While Practicing Selection.

Otti’s Rhetoric vs. Reality — Preaching Democracy While Practicing Selection.

Governor Alex Otti’s recent warning against election rigging — “Write your will before you write election results” — has made waves across Abia State. Yet, for many, his fiery rhetoric rings hollow. While he champions democracy publicly, Otti’s administration has been accused of bypassing internal party processes and handpicking local government officials through a splinter party seen as his personal vehicle. Critics argue that this selective practice of “elections” undermines the very democratic principles he claims to defend. As tensions rise ahead of the 2027 governorship race, Abians are left wondering: can Otti’s call for electoral integrity be trusted when his own record suggests otherwise?

Share this article